Highlights
NEW! Kentucky Courier-Journal editorial highlights the value of judicial campaign oversight committees in the shadow of recent Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling allowing judges to affiliate themselves with political parties.
NEW! Operating Effective Judicial Campaign Oversight Committees Resource Center
The National Ad Hoc Committee announces the release of its new web-based Resource Center for new and existing judicial campaign oversight committees. The Resource Center is based on the Ad Hoc Committee's cumulative work, and is designed to:
-
Assess the needs for an oversight committee;
-
Establish a mission statement and bylaws;
-
Develop communication strategies and outreach plans
-
Connect more effectively with candidates and the public;
-
Manage and monitor campaign activity during election years; and
-
Plan for continuing operations in non-election years.
The Resource Center includes the following features:
Video excerpts from presentations and panel discussions at the most recent National Workshop on Effective Judicial Campaign Oversight Committees;
Interviews with leaders of judicial campaign oversight committees across the country;
Updated materials and guidance generated from the latest edition of the Ad Hoc Committee's How-to-Handbook on effective judicial campaign oversight committees; and
New resources, sample documents and planning tools based on common and effective practices for oversight committees. Visit the Resource Center »
Judicial Campaign Ads Online
Much of the reason that judicial campaigns have become "nosier, nastier, and costlier" is the result of increased reliance and use of TV ads by candidate and most especially by third-party groups. This collection of ads obtained from You Tube in recent appellate court races is a sample of what is airing throughout the United States every election cycle.
See the ads »
Revised Advice on Questionnaires
A few recommendations include:
1. Do not be rushed in deciding how to handle the questionnaire.
2. Never use the pre-printed answers provided on the questionnaire.
3. Consider responding with a letter
4. Never use a judicial Canon to justify a decision not to respond.
5. Distinguish general-interest, non-advocacy groups from special interest advocacy groups—and be consistent. Read more »